jewish wedding vows
The Hebrew ring declaration with transliteration and translation, why a traditional Jewish wedding has no vow exchange, the ketubah, and where personal words can fit.

Use only the details you choose, then edit, version, rehearse, and print privately.
Start writingA traditional Jewish wedding has no vows. That is not a technicality, it is the structure. There is no exchange of promises about sickness and health, because the moment that creates the marriage is not a promise at all.
What happens instead is kiddushin: the groom places a ring and speaks one sentence, in front of two witnesses who must both hear it and see the ring placed. The obligations of the marriage live in the ketubah, a written contract. Understanding that before you plan saves a lot of confusion, because what you can add and where depends entirely on which movement is officiating.
The moment that effects the marriage is called kiddushin, the betrothal. The groom places a plain ring on the bride's finger and speaks one sentence in Hebrew, in the presence of two valid witnesses who must both hear the words and see the ring placed.
The word mekudeshet is usually translated consecrated or set apart. It shares a root with kadosh, holy, and carries the sense of being designated for one purpose. The declaration ends k'dat Moshe v'Yisrael, according to the law of Moses and Israel, placing the marriage inside a legal tradition rather than only a personal one.
The ring must traditionally be a plain, unbroken band without stones, so that its value is obvious and undisputed. This is a legal requirement about the transaction rather than an aesthetic preference.
The legal category here is kinyan, acquisition. Mishnah Kiddushin 1:1 states that a woman is acquired in three ways, through money, through a document, and through intercourse, and the ring functions as the money. That is uncomfortable language for many modern couples, and it is better to know it than to be surprised by it later.
It also explains the asymmetry. In a traditional ceremony the groom speaks and the bride does not, and her silent acceptance of the ring is what completes the act. Anything she says has no legal effect on it.
Reform practice has documented its departure from this. The Central Conference of American Rabbis records the use of two rings with both partners reciting the formula, a change tracing back to the Philadelphia Conference of 1869. If the asymmetry matters to you, this is a well-trodden conversation and your rabbi will have had it many times.
The ketubah is a marriage contract, historically written in Aramaic, setting out the husband's obligations to his wife including her financial protection. It is signed before the ceremony, read aloud during it, and given to the bride. The couple do not recite it.
Because the obligations are documented rather than declaimed, the ceremony does not need a spoken list of promises. Many couples find this striking once they see it: the commitments are in writing, witnessed and kept, rather than said once and remembered differently by everyone present.
Non-Orthodox couples often commission an egalitarian or personalised ketubah with reciprocal language, and the text is frequently where the couple's own words appear. Words that will hang on a wall for fifty years reward more thought than words spoken once.
Whether the bride gives a ring and speaks in return depends on the movement. Orthodox practice generally keeps kiddushin one-directional, because a reciprocal exchange can raise a legal question about whether the acquisition has taken place.
Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist ceremonies commonly include a second ring with a reciprocal declaration in the masculine form, Harei atah mekudash li, or with a verse from Song of Songs such as ani l'dodi v'dodi li, I am my beloved's and my beloved is mine.
If a double-ring ceremony matters to you, raise it with your rabbi before the invitations go out. It is a straightforward question with a clear answer in each movement.
Practice varies significantly between Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist communities and between individual rabbis. Confirm every detail with the rabbi officiating your ceremony.
The ceremony has two historically distinct parts, now performed together: kiddushin, the betrothal with the ring, and nisuin, the marriage itself, marked by the sheva brachot, the seven blessings, recited over a cup of wine. The blessings derive from the Talmud, Ketubot 8a.
The chuppah, the canopy the couple stand under, represents the home they are building, open on all sides in the tradition of Abraham's hospitality. The breaking of a glass closes the ceremony, and interpretations range from remembering the destruction of the Temple to acknowledging that even at the height of joy the world is unrepaired.
Many couples add a bedeken, the veiling, before the ceremony, and a yichud, a brief period of seclusion immediately afterwards. Protect the yichud: it is often the only ten minutes of the day you get alone together.
In non-Orthodox ceremonies, personal vows usually go after the ring exchange and before the seven blessings, at the rabbi's discretion. Keep them short. The ceremony has a strong shape already and a four-minute speech dropped into it feels like an interruption rather than an addition.
Sixty to ninety seconds each is plenty under the chuppah. Say the thing only you would say, then stop.
The other natural home for personal words is the ketubah text, which many couples now write together with their rabbi.
Read the complete text, copy it, or take it into the private writer and make it yours.
Spoken by the groom as the ring is placed, in the presence of two witnesses.
- Transliteration
- Harei at mekudeshet li b'taba'at zo k'dat Moshe v'Yisrael.
- English
- Behold, you are consecrated to me with this ring, according to the law of Moses and Israel.
Transliteration conventions vary. Ask your rabbi for the spelling and pronunciation used in your community.
Used in many Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist ceremonies. Confirm the form with your rabbi.
- Transliteration
- Harei atah mekudash li b'taba'at zo k'dat Moshe v'Yisrael.
- English
- Behold, you are consecrated to me with this ring, according to the law of Moses and Israel.
A common alternative or addition when the bride gives a ring.
- Transliteration
- Ani l'dodi v'dodi li.
- English
- I am my beloved's and my beloved is mine.
Around ninety words, sized to sit inside the traditional ceremony rather than compete with it.
- Spoken by each partner
- [Name], the contract we signed today says what I owe you. This is what I want you to know. I promise to build the kind of home this chuppah is standing in for: open on every side, warm to anyone who walks in, and honest inside its own walls. I promise to argue with you kindly and to apologise first more often than is fair. And I promise that whatever the world breaks, I will keep showing up to help you mend it.
Filter, copy, and save examples that match your role and tone.
6 examples
Traditionally there are none. The groom places a ring and says Harei at mekudeshet li b'taba'at zo k'dat Moshe v'Yisrael, behold you are consecrated to me with this ring according to the law of Moses and Israel. The obligations of the marriage are set out in the ketubah instead.
Behold, you are consecrated to me. Mekudeshet means set apart or designated, from the same root as the Hebrew word for holy. The full sentence adds with this ring, according to the law of Moses and Israel.
Because the act is legally an acquisition, kinyan, rather than a mutual promise. In traditional practice the groom speaks and the bride's silent acceptance of the ring completes it. Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist ceremonies commonly add a reciprocal declaration.
In Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist ceremonies this is common, usually placed after the ring exchange. Orthodox ceremonies keep to the traditional rite. Ask your rabbi, and keep personal vows to about ninety seconds each.
A marriage contract, traditionally in Aramaic, setting out the husband's obligations to his wife. It is signed by witnesses before the ceremony, read aloud during it, and given to the bride. The couple do not recite it. Many now use egalitarian or personalised texts.
The most common explanation is remembrance of the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, a note of sorrow at the height of celebration. Other readings include the irreversibility of the moment and an acknowledgement that the world is still unrepaired.
Because the ring functions legally as an object of clear, undisputed value in the betrothal. A plain unbroken band without stones cannot be misjudged in worth, which keeps the act unambiguous before the witnesses.
Liturgical and legal wording is quoted from the published texts below. Local practice still varies, so confirm with your officiant.